Comments on: More secure products that aren’t

By: shadow

shadow — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:35 +0000

YOu hav a point neco…we are not really affected by this anyway…i make sure my stuff
is all sercure and i’m sure you do the same!!! in our world we look for holes to get thru for more info what do you think rogue???

By: neco

neco — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:36:42 +0000

amen. we have disclaimers for most everything that can have unadvertised/undisclosed risks. when you look at a pack of smokes, the surgeon general does not say “These shits are delicious!” No, the surgeon general says “The tobacco company wont tell you, but these shits will fuck your world up!” then it’s up to the consumer to continue their purchase or not.

same thing should apply to misrepresentation of an implied cryptographic standard to unsuspecting consumers.

By: shadow

shadow — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:47:21 +0000

$$$$$$$ money is the answer my friend! Big companies don’t care if it is sercure, they
have dead lines and need to make it so that the man /woman above them gets their check
at the end of the month/week/day … that’s how it is and it’s always been that way….

i work for a telecomunications company and just recently discovered that we are not giving
the clients what they are paying…. if the client was 512 line the only getting 350….
so they are getting ripped off but i don’t do anything about it….so if they pay for 4 meg
then they can get 512 the wanted….the world is just full of rip offs…

i just wanna fly away from it all …